It's October 2017, its also the anniversary of 5 years since my symptoms started but I'm starting on a new positive because at the start of the week my boss and cousin made me change GP surgery. I haven't visited my GP in a long while due to the arrogance and lack of care towards my symptoms. I refuse to go somewhere that makes me feel stupid. I have lost trust in most doctors I've came across but I'm giving my new GP surgery a chance. I met the new doctor who was very pleasant and listened to me. I couldn't go into all details or I would of been there a week to explain everything. I do have a fear that once the new GP receives my notes that he believes what is written in them and not me. Consultants letters are lets face it, of more weight and valued more than a patient sitting telling a GP the situation. The new GP (lets give him a name, I shall call him Garfield) Garfield might think I am a hypochondriac and be more in favour of the fact that all neurologists state I have not had a dissection and if that is the case I won't be able to discuss anything to do with my symptoms that I believe have come from the dissection, I will only be able to discuss the symptoms relating to the colloid cyst.
Anyway I am waffling on, the reason I went to see Garfield was I recently was on a flight and became unwell afterwards spending three days flat on my back because my head had immense pressure pushing to the top of my skull, I was unsure if the flight had moved the cyst. I could hardly stand and had to lie down. I haven't had that for a while but in this instance it was a different head pressure and headache and the tinnitus was so loud, the pulsatile tinnitus was just its normal but the ringing tinnitus was louder than normal, it still is and the headache is lingering. I can differentiate between the headache near the base of my skull and the headache on top and I believe the one on top is from the cyst.
Garfield and I have spoken about the best plan of action regarding the cyst so I will get my PI Wanderer cap on and do some investigating on the best person to see for the cyst or little colloid cunt as I have been referring to it. Lets hope I don't slip up when chatting to Garfield!!!
All for now your Whooshing Whirring friend
Friday 6 October 2017
Monday 4 September 2017
Sometimes I have no words except sweary ones! September 2017 Update
Do you ever have a strange random thought that some bastard is out to get you? Anyway I never got the promised telephone call from London. Nor did the response only take a few weeks, to be exact I was told around 3-4 weeks.
I received a letter/report on the 17th June 2017 from Dr Matharu it states it was typed on the 31st March. I was a day patient from the 28th to 31st March so if it was indeed typed on the 31st my scans must of been reviewed the previous two days in which they could of told me what the findings were. It certainly was a long time to wait all of April, all of May and half of June to receive a letter, maybe it got lost on its long journey from England to Scotland.
The opinion on my scans MRI 2013 and CTA 2015: NO DISSECTION IDENTIFIED. He concurs with his friend Dr Tyagi that a dissection is not the cause of her headache. He also states "he would be happy to see her again on the understanding that she accepts our opinion regarding the dissection"
My Expert Opinion: It is very unfortunate and strange that doctors too in London have issues with their eyesight. Also I might add that there were 3 scans to be reviewed. My MRA 2014 was not reported on and there is no reason given as to why it was not reported on. I gave two copies of my MRA as they said there was an issue with it, the second copy was posted and there was no issue with it as I had it copied and tried in several computer systems and all images were viewable.
Interestingly Dr Matharu states I have a colloid cyst on the left of the foramen Monroe in the third ventricle of my brain that was not visible in 2013 and a microadenoma can not be ruled out. I have previously asked if there was anything showing on my pituitary gland due to some hormone problems and I was told no.
Coincidence that its on the left? The report does not state if some of my recent symptoms could be caused by a colloid cyst. Remember I told doctor's about the newer type of headache at the top of my head and I had a feeling something else was going on.
My care has been transferred back to my GP and Neurologist Dr Tyagi. Its now September and I have heard nothing. I have had to search the internet to find out what a colloid cyst is.
I phoned my GP surgery to see if they too had received the letter and the receptionist said they had, she confirmed I was referred to neurology.
So if you need a recap, I was sent to London for a second independent opinion in January (only it wasn't independent as it was my neurologists friend) In January I was told along with my husband what I had was a New Daily Headache and that I did not have a dissection previously to cause my symptoms. I was told 100% I did not have a vertebral artery dissection. I disagreed and told him so. I questioned this as my scans had not been reviewed. I was then invited back to London in March for a review of my scans, again I was told nothing would be found yet they still hadn't reviewed my scans. Scans eventaully reviewed and lettered mid June. I should not have been referred to a neurologist regarding my scans, I wanted an opinion on my scans to speak with a Neurointervention specialist not to be speaking with a Neurologist who assures me his radiology department could not see anything. Why can any other joe bloggs see my scans are not normal?
I'm still whooshing,whirring, headaching and vertigoing along with a little colloid cunt of a friend.
I received a letter/report on the 17th June 2017 from Dr Matharu it states it was typed on the 31st March. I was a day patient from the 28th to 31st March so if it was indeed typed on the 31st my scans must of been reviewed the previous two days in which they could of told me what the findings were. It certainly was a long time to wait all of April, all of May and half of June to receive a letter, maybe it got lost on its long journey from England to Scotland.
The opinion on my scans MRI 2013 and CTA 2015: NO DISSECTION IDENTIFIED. He concurs with his friend Dr Tyagi that a dissection is not the cause of her headache. He also states "he would be happy to see her again on the understanding that she accepts our opinion regarding the dissection"
My Expert Opinion: It is very unfortunate and strange that doctors too in London have issues with their eyesight. Also I might add that there were 3 scans to be reviewed. My MRA 2014 was not reported on and there is no reason given as to why it was not reported on. I gave two copies of my MRA as they said there was an issue with it, the second copy was posted and there was no issue with it as I had it copied and tried in several computer systems and all images were viewable.
Interestingly Dr Matharu states I have a colloid cyst on the left of the foramen Monroe in the third ventricle of my brain that was not visible in 2013 and a microadenoma can not be ruled out. I have previously asked if there was anything showing on my pituitary gland due to some hormone problems and I was told no.
Coincidence that its on the left? The report does not state if some of my recent symptoms could be caused by a colloid cyst. Remember I told doctor's about the newer type of headache at the top of my head and I had a feeling something else was going on.
My care has been transferred back to my GP and Neurologist Dr Tyagi. Its now September and I have heard nothing. I have had to search the internet to find out what a colloid cyst is.
I phoned my GP surgery to see if they too had received the letter and the receptionist said they had, she confirmed I was referred to neurology.
So if you need a recap, I was sent to London for a second independent opinion in January (only it wasn't independent as it was my neurologists friend) In January I was told along with my husband what I had was a New Daily Headache and that I did not have a dissection previously to cause my symptoms. I was told 100% I did not have a vertebral artery dissection. I disagreed and told him so. I questioned this as my scans had not been reviewed. I was then invited back to London in March for a review of my scans, again I was told nothing would be found yet they still hadn't reviewed my scans. Scans eventaully reviewed and lettered mid June. I should not have been referred to a neurologist regarding my scans, I wanted an opinion on my scans to speak with a Neurointervention specialist not to be speaking with a Neurologist who assures me his radiology department could not see anything. Why can any other joe bloggs see my scans are not normal?
I'm still whooshing,whirring, headaching and vertigoing along with a little colloid cunt of a friend.
Tuesday 16 May 2017
Why clinical suspicion can save lives!
This link tells the story of a man suffering from unusual symptoms, he was particularly affected by pulsatile tinnitus, the story appeared in the NY times whereby readers are offered to try and diagnose the case https://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2016/01/07/diagnosis-lisa-sanders-pain-tinnitus-ringing-in-the-ears/
The following link gives the diagnosis and shows that if the right doctor is consulted a cause can be found of unusual symptoms, the person to finally diagnose the complicated case was in fact Dr Maxim Shapiro, the very Neurointervention specialist that I reached out to back in 2015 and gave his expert opinion on my scans. Enjoy reading his findings
https://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2016/01/08/diagnosis-lisa-sanders-pulsatile-tinnitus-fistula-chest-pain-hearing/?ref=health
The following link gives the diagnosis and shows that if the right doctor is consulted a cause can be found of unusual symptoms, the person to finally diagnose the complicated case was in fact Dr Maxim Shapiro, the very Neurointervention specialist that I reached out to back in 2015 and gave his expert opinion on my scans. Enjoy reading his findings
https://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2016/01/08/diagnosis-lisa-sanders-pulsatile-tinnitus-fistula-chest-pain-hearing/?ref=health
An emergency doctor explains his Vertebral Artery Dissection
An emergency physician's story on how his symptoms developed and how he was diagnosed with a left vertebral artery dissection http://blog.thesullivangroup.com/vertebral-artery-dissection
May 2017 Update
I received a letter back in March giving me two weeks notice for my return appointment in London. Fortunately Mr Wanderer and I managed to arrange time off work and travelled down. I attended the hospital between 27th-31st March. I'd class this visit as organised chaos. I logged each day in my diary. On the 27th I arrived and was booked in and taken for a blood test. I then met with a female registrar who takes some notes. I was told Dr Matharu had yet to receive information and scans from Scotland. This was my second time travelling to London and the doctors had still not reviewed my scans. After a wait I was invited back in to speak with Dr Matharu and the registrar, Dr Matharu said there would be no problem as they were doing a scan in my time there. I wasn't happy about this and I offered to loan them my copies which I had taken with me as I had a feeling my scans wouldn't have been received. My discs were taken away and copied, I was told here was an issue with one disc my Mra from 2014. I asked what the issue was but no one told me. I said I would post another copy down. (I posted another copy on the 7th April with details) I also included a letter of some of my concerns. On the Wednesday 29th I met with Dr Matharu and he said if anything at all was found on my scans he would let me know immediately when I got home by telephoning, he said it would take around 3 weeks.
During my time in London, I had two injections, a blood test, an ecg, a brain scan and a visit to a Neurotolgist who said I had a balance issue. I received a letter two weeks later from him which stated visual vertigo was his diagnosis.
I am still waiting on the opinion and results of my scans from Dr Matharu after reviewing and comparing my old and new scans.
Your still Whooshing & Whirring friend
During my time in London, I had two injections, a blood test, an ecg, a brain scan and a visit to a Neurotolgist who said I had a balance issue. I received a letter two weeks later from him which stated visual vertigo was his diagnosis.
I am still waiting on the opinion and results of my scans from Dr Matharu after reviewing and comparing my old and new scans.
Your still Whooshing & Whirring friend
Sunday 12 February 2017
Words of wisdom
In all the reading I have done on my persistent symptoms in trying to gain a diagnosis and trying to help my doctors see that my symptoms are real, the following quote could not be more apt, to all the Doctors I have met and to all who have dismissed me "It is unwise to be too sure of one's own wisdom. It is healthy to be reminded that the strongest might weaken and the wisest might err." ~ Mahatma Gandhi
Sunday 22 January 2017
January 2017 Update
Mr Wanderer and I travelled to London from Scotland for my appointment on Wednesday 18th January. We arrived at The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery at 10am we were met with a very dour woman/nursing assistant who took my blood pressure and my weight. A smile would of gone a long way, but I'm sure she was just having an off day or maybe recovering from a wine headache. Would you believe the scales were 1.5 stone out which meant I'd put on a stone and a half within a day travelling from Scotland to England, thankfully I lost the 1.5st by the time I'd got back to Scotland. We met first with a Dr Leckie/Lecky? he welcomed us into the room and explained he had a Scottish family connection and had done his training there. He showed me the referral letter from Dr Tyagi which I had a copy of in my bag, he said it was a basic referral and we would start at the beginning and that's when I relayed all my symptoms on when they started. He focused on the headache and seemed to disregard the pulsatile tinnitus explaining that it was tinnitus with a pulsatile nature, I went on to explain that in America it now had a diagnosis code of its own and was regarded as a separate symptom from the normal ringing buzzing tinnitus. I went through my symptoms in detail and gave enough information on how the noise in the left of my head started one evening followed by the headache the next morning. I went on to say about the other symptoms developing and how I'd gone to my GP several times, A&E, ENT, changed GP surgeries and arranged to have private scans carried out. I explained that I was convinced the symptoms started after painting my ceiling over two days and had relayed the same information to each Doctor I'd seen. Dr Leckie said "I see that's where the dissection story comes from" I mentioned I could hear the sound in my head with a stethoscope and although he listened later towards the end of the consultation he couldn't hear it, to be honest there was background noise and I couldn't pick it up myself, not that it matters I know the noise in my head is blood pumping through the section of my vertebral artery that has had a previous tear. Dr Leckie said he seen many patients with vertebral artery dissection and all had serious strokes. (For note not everyone who has a vertebral artery dissection has a stroke and some can present with just headache or just neck pain) I explained how I'd tracked down doctors on the other side of the world and sent my scans and symptoms and all had came back with the same diagnosis however no doctor in Scotland could see on the scans what the others were reporting, neither was there much investigating into my symptoms or trying to match them up to what was showing on my scans. I also mentioned that Dr Tyagi had on his paperwork it was a carotid artery dissection being questioned. I made it very clear that at no point was the carotid ever being questioned (this was a mistake that Dr Tyagi made) . I also explained that when I'd had a hospital stay for the drug infusion back in 2015 that two consultants spoke with me in regards to my scans and could see no evidence of a carotid dissection (again wrong information and wrong artery) I asked Dr Leckie if he had any of the reports or scans and he said no. I then gave him a copy of the report from Dr Shapiro in New York. Dr Leckie had asked how my health was overall and I said it was very good, I suffered from Hypermobility Syndrome sometimes known as EDS 3 but that I had managed it well over the years and kept my muscles toned with walking. Mr Wanderer and I were then asked to take a seat outside in the waiting area and then I would be seen by Dr Matharu.
We waited around 15 minutes outside the room and could hear conversations taking place with Dr Leckie relaying the information to Dr Matharu, we were then invited to speak with both doctors. Dr Matharu focused on diagnosing my EDS hypermobility and went through the Beighton score with me which I've already had done years previously by a Rheumatologist. I was a bit miffed on why he was focusing on it but then I realised he had already diagnosed me before I entered the room from the information I gave to Dr Leckie. Dr Matharu stated he seen many patients with EDS and what I had was a New Daily Persistent Headache Syndrome with no underlying cause but that it was linked to EDS. I asked why now would I suddenly have a new headache accompanied by many other severe symptoms when I'd never been bothered by headache before? Dr Matharu moved on to say that I had developed the condition. I'd actually read about this particular headache a few years previously and ruled it out as I was never sick or suffered nausea, the pattern didn't fit. I listened for a bit then interrupted to state I didn't agree and that I knew the cause of my headache was to do with the previous missed tear in my artery. Dr Matharu said it is what it is you have a daily persistent headache, he said he agreed with his colleagues findings and that there was no vertebral artery dissection and although new daily headache occasionally had an underlying cause, mine was a primary condition and he seen many patients with EDS who had that same new daily headache. I said I didn't agree and that Dr Tyagi had been reporting on the wrong artery, Dr Matharu then stated he had since received further communication from Dr Tyagi to say my scans had been re looked and there was no vertebral dissection. (I was obviously not copied in to that communication yet again) I went on to ask why I can see lines on my scan images and tried to show an image on my phone, Dr Matharu refused and said they had the best doctors and he was 100% sure that I had not suffered a dissection. Dr Leckie then asked even if we did find a dissection what do you think we can do, I explained about Dr Shapiro's report and how he could close off the false side of the artery to stop my symptoms, both doctors said they wouldn't do that and that I would be creating problems for myself. I felt myself becoming angry, they were both being arrogant in answering my questions. Did they honestly expect me to sit quiet after travelling down from Scotland for a second opinion when they had not read reports or my scans and tried overwhelmingly to convince me that my diagnosis was that of daily persistent headache caused by EDS? I continued to talk and state that something was causing my symptoms. Dr Matharu eventually offered to repeat scans and compare them and I'd be invited back to London, he continued "I can assure you we won't find anything" I don't doubt his intelligence but he was certainly doubting mine. I had seen the scans, he had not! I tried again to show an image on my phone but was brushed off, I then repeated again please look at this one image where you can see an intramural haematoma and at that I took my phone out my pocket and thrust it towards them, both doctors stated there wasn't anything and had a few whispers to each other, Dr Leckie said it was hard to tell from one image, I reminded him that there were several more images showing the same, Dr Matharu stating don't worry about it we will compare all your other scans to the new scans. I felt his manner was self assured that he was right and I was wrong, he repeated they had the best doctors, in my opinion I had yet to see the best of doctors. Not a single Doctor has taken Dr Shaprio's report seriously. I asked do you believe that image is normal as well as the others in Dr Shapiro's report showing a clear line through the artery and Dr Matharu said look I'm happy to be proved wrong but I don't see anything and I don't believe you had a dissection I'm 99% sure I don't think we will find anything. Dr Matharu offered to arrange scans and trial some medication over 5 days, the waiting time would be around 3 months. Dr Matharu's certainty dropped from 100% to 99%.
In my opinion I wasn't given a fair second opinion, I was diagnosed before I entered the room. For both doctor's to diagnose without looking at my symptoms in detail and not having looked at my scans is very poor practice. Having disregarded my other symptoms and Dr Shapiro's report I have no trust in these doctors.
Overall the appointment went how I'd imagined and it wasn't a surprise that my original symptoms were dismissed. No one can explain why I'm having numerous symptoms, no one can explain what's on my scan, no one is willing to link my symptoms to what is clear on the scans. Having studied various literature on dissections and looking at scans I know what is on my scans.
All for now your still whooshing whirring friend
We waited around 15 minutes outside the room and could hear conversations taking place with Dr Leckie relaying the information to Dr Matharu, we were then invited to speak with both doctors. Dr Matharu focused on diagnosing my EDS hypermobility and went through the Beighton score with me which I've already had done years previously by a Rheumatologist. I was a bit miffed on why he was focusing on it but then I realised he had already diagnosed me before I entered the room from the information I gave to Dr Leckie. Dr Matharu stated he seen many patients with EDS and what I had was a New Daily Persistent Headache Syndrome with no underlying cause but that it was linked to EDS. I asked why now would I suddenly have a new headache accompanied by many other severe symptoms when I'd never been bothered by headache before? Dr Matharu moved on to say that I had developed the condition. I'd actually read about this particular headache a few years previously and ruled it out as I was never sick or suffered nausea, the pattern didn't fit. I listened for a bit then interrupted to state I didn't agree and that I knew the cause of my headache was to do with the previous missed tear in my artery. Dr Matharu said it is what it is you have a daily persistent headache, he said he agreed with his colleagues findings and that there was no vertebral artery dissection and although new daily headache occasionally had an underlying cause, mine was a primary condition and he seen many patients with EDS who had that same new daily headache. I said I didn't agree and that Dr Tyagi had been reporting on the wrong artery, Dr Matharu then stated he had since received further communication from Dr Tyagi to say my scans had been re looked and there was no vertebral dissection. (I was obviously not copied in to that communication yet again) I went on to ask why I can see lines on my scan images and tried to show an image on my phone, Dr Matharu refused and said they had the best doctors and he was 100% sure that I had not suffered a dissection. Dr Leckie then asked even if we did find a dissection what do you think we can do, I explained about Dr Shapiro's report and how he could close off the false side of the artery to stop my symptoms, both doctors said they wouldn't do that and that I would be creating problems for myself. I felt myself becoming angry, they were both being arrogant in answering my questions. Did they honestly expect me to sit quiet after travelling down from Scotland for a second opinion when they had not read reports or my scans and tried overwhelmingly to convince me that my diagnosis was that of daily persistent headache caused by EDS? I continued to talk and state that something was causing my symptoms. Dr Matharu eventually offered to repeat scans and compare them and I'd be invited back to London, he continued "I can assure you we won't find anything" I don't doubt his intelligence but he was certainly doubting mine. I had seen the scans, he had not! I tried again to show an image on my phone but was brushed off, I then repeated again please look at this one image where you can see an intramural haematoma and at that I took my phone out my pocket and thrust it towards them, both doctors stated there wasn't anything and had a few whispers to each other, Dr Leckie said it was hard to tell from one image, I reminded him that there were several more images showing the same, Dr Matharu stating don't worry about it we will compare all your other scans to the new scans. I felt his manner was self assured that he was right and I was wrong, he repeated they had the best doctors, in my opinion I had yet to see the best of doctors. Not a single Doctor has taken Dr Shaprio's report seriously. I asked do you believe that image is normal as well as the others in Dr Shapiro's report showing a clear line through the artery and Dr Matharu said look I'm happy to be proved wrong but I don't see anything and I don't believe you had a dissection I'm 99% sure I don't think we will find anything. Dr Matharu offered to arrange scans and trial some medication over 5 days, the waiting time would be around 3 months. Dr Matharu's certainty dropped from 100% to 99%.
In my opinion I wasn't given a fair second opinion, I was diagnosed before I entered the room. For both doctor's to diagnose without looking at my symptoms in detail and not having looked at my scans is very poor practice. Having disregarded my other symptoms and Dr Shapiro's report I have no trust in these doctors.
Overall the appointment went how I'd imagined and it wasn't a surprise that my original symptoms were dismissed. No one can explain why I'm having numerous symptoms, no one can explain what's on my scan, no one is willing to link my symptoms to what is clear on the scans. Having studied various literature on dissections and looking at scans I know what is on my scans.
All for now your still whooshing whirring friend
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)